There has always been a disconnect between what people believe and what they do. There has always been a disconnect between theory and practice. There has always been a disconnect between what I read that profoundly hits me in the face yet doesn’t actualize into my life. I think in many ways this disconnect is what I have been searching to work out in my life and my profession (psychotherapy) - it’s at least one major piece I’ve been searching.
Lately I’ve learned more about phenomenology and the idea that many beliefs from the Modern era, and still into now, have been heavily influenced by Rene Descartes’ dictum, “I think, therefore I am.” What this did is not only cut off the the mind from the body, but it cut off the mind from the environment. I’m not going to get into phenomenology here as I’m still trying to get my head around it, but it is a way to “return to the things themselves.” Instead of arranging beliefs and cognitive thinking ‘about’ me, my life, my relationships, and my surroundings, it is more about that actual experience as I’m having it. It is about those actual surroundings as I see and experience them. Or something like that. Ultimately what I want to say here is a huge piece to all the disconnect I see is a result of what has been entitled a Cartesian way of thinking, separating out belief and thought from an embodied experience.
I’ve been reading more Christian writers lately, ones that are coming from a perspective that is not Cartesian, and looks to get back to the actual experience of things. In many ways this entails the body. It entails a focus, not on my beliefs about my life or experiences, but on my bodily experience. If there is anything I have ignored in my life it is my body. Although I was a very active kid and played serious soccer through college, I completely neglect my body. I’m always searching for “answers” in books and my thoughts. I keep reading and thinking and reading and thinking and reading and thinking. Now, just reading that last sentence can ignite a common sense response that that isn’t going to answer my questions alone, but it is something I think many of us do in this world.
I’m currently reading a book entitled The Strangest Way: Walking the Christian Path by Robert Barron. Barron is a Catholic Priest. I grew up in an Evangelical Christian home and have always thought that Catholicism didn’t get it because it was more about works. But what is interesting to me in my reading is that the impact of post-modernity and non-Cartesian ways of thinking, brings us closer to an embodied Christianity, something that Catholicism is better equipped to provide. To me, it isn’t about believing in Catholicism but seeing how important acts of the body are on our beliefs and our emotions and experiences.
Barron talks about William James’ discussion of the body and emotions and how he said that it isn’t sadness that brings tears but tears that bring sadness. Barron goes on to explain that it isn’t always our beliefs or feelings that bring a virtuous response but our physical activity that brings a virtuous response. One example he used was kneeling for prayer. We might better experience submission by kneeling than by just thinking about it or praying for it. I am coming to see the real power this idea has on our lives. I also think it explains many things.
What I believe we have missed by the way we construct meaning and understanding of our lives is the power of embodied knowledge. What Barron and James and others looking to bring us toward a non-dualist type of understanding are saying is that there is actually knowledge in our bodies. Now this sounds strange if you’ve always thought it’s all in your head and all in your brain. This is what we have been told. But sometimes it is in our bodies, in our behavior. Although behaviorism did not get this right, they did get some of it right in that behaving a certain way can change our internal way of constructing our world. But due to behaviorism’s reductionistic way of approaching human behavior, it lost the power of an integrated whole. We need to see that we are whole people. We need to see that thought alone does not change our experience and our emotions. We need to understand a full embodied experience of our lives. We need to understand that sometimes we need to do something that relies on a physical experience. We need to understand that listening to a sensation in our body can actually bring thoughts and images “up” into our thinking brains and not the other way around (see Focusing).
I believe this is another disconnect between theory and practice in psychotherapy as well as any philosophy of life. We might argue against a theory, or we may argue against a religion but until we actually fully engage in the impact of what those philosophies offer, we cannot really know or judge them. But we do this all the time. It is like we stand outside a roller coaster and discuss the merits of its ability to bring fun and excitement but never actually get on the stupid thing. I might argue against Buddhism or Christianity from a purely intellectual understanding, but I will never know their impact on my life unless I fully engage myself in their process.
This is where subjectivity comes in for me and where Cartesian, “objective” science has wronged us. If we are going to discuss theories of life, in many ways we need to share our personal experiences with them. We cannot just argue them because it all just becomes a matter of words and logic and semantics. This eventually means nothing without some sort of personal/subjective embodied experience that puts a “reality” to the way of organizing experience (belief, thought, etc). I’m not saying there is no room for objective or outside perspective. Other people’s experience of me also helps me to gain understanding of myself and my experiences. We can easily hide behind our thoughts and our beliefs without ever experiencing their impact on our lives (Rollins, 2012). What is the point of personal human beings arguing about philosophies of life without expressing their own personal experiences with them? Do they just believe it because it’s a good argument or because their parents thought similarly or because some quantitative research says so? Beliefs and ways of thinking or constructing our world become meaningless without an embodied subjective experience of their impact.
So where does this leave me and my journey/process of things? Well I realize how much I need to not just listen to my body, but use it as a means of “thinking”. I cannot rely solely on my cognitive thinking process (which I guess could be argued that my body has always been a part of in some way I just ignored it) but find a way to listen to my whole experience, to listen to my whole being which includes a body that takes up way more space than my head alone. What I feed it, how I exercise it, how I rest it — these are more important than just being “healthy”: how I care for my body has a direct result on how I live my life, on how I understand my emotional and intellectual experiences. My body is connected to me. I am in and around my body. Why would I ignore this? Why wouldn’t I listen to this? So, instead of always thinking my way through problems, I want to utilize embodied processes that integrate my entire mind/body experience.